BeerDorks.com: Reviews, Commentary and Opinions on Midwest Craft Beer and Microbreweries

 
January 12, 2009

Beer Diary:

Feel The Fire

Eddie and Jug finally and semi-definitively prove whether Capital Brewery?s Autumnal Fire recipe has been tweaked?or wrenched?from year to year.
by Eddie Glick

I like my beer like my women: pale, strong, full-bodied, and extremely bitter.
Contact Eddie»
So I got invited over to Jug Dunningan’s “house” the other night. I hesitate to use the word “house” when referring to where Jug lives. Sure, there’s four walls and a roof, and he spends most of his time there. But in all other aspects it resembles a brewery more than a house. First, you walk in and you about fall over a fifty pound bag of malted barley in front of the door. This is right next to a giant closet that is stacked with boxes and sacks of barley, wheat, rye, and a host of other adjunct grains. Then you get into the “living” room. There’s all varieties of fermenters in there: glass carboys, plastic ale pails, mini stainless steel vessels. All a-bubbling with his latest brews. There’s also a giant black spot on the wall where some piece of equipment burned up while he was out of town birding or hunting or getting married or some damn thing. When the cops called to tell him his “house” was on fire, he yelled “Is the beer OK?” Which, thank Jebus, it was. In fact, the firemen used the grain bag to prop open the door while they hosed the wall down.

Then you stumble into the kitchen, where, of course, there’s a fridge. (There’s also a coffee maker, which has been known to be brewing beer. I’m NOT shitting you.) You’d think there’d be beer in the fridge, but you’d be wrong. Instead there’s a bunch of bottles that look like beer, except they’ve got stoppers with airlocks jammed into them. These would be yeast cultures. My advice is don’t drink any of these if you happen across them. Sure, they’ll straighten out virtually any digestive problems you might be experiencing, but they’re a little … yeasty in the palate. Plus, Jug gets really pissed when you drink his house yeast. Not that I would know firsthand or anything.

For the record, the beer fridge is in the basement, and it’s usually filled to bursting with bombers of home brew.

Anway, it’s not very often I get invited to Jug’s house—or anybody’s house, for that matter—and since it’s a bit of a haul to his place from my parents’, I decided to bring a special treat: a bottle of Capital Brewery Autumnal Fire from each of the last four years. You may recall from about a year ago that I tasted the 2005, 2006, and 2007 vintages side by side by side to see if they differed. It was my theory that Capital had not just tweaked the recipe from previous years, but changed it quite drastically by lightening it up. Or, as I’d like to call it, dumbing it down. My results were only slightly conclusive, since I couldn’t pin down whether the differences in the various vintages were more due to the aging process rather than Capital tinkering with the recipe. But now, with four years to compare, I think we’ve got some more concrete evidence.

First, a quick recap on the effects of aging on beer. It basically dulls hoppiness while accentuating malt and alcohol. All these beers were stored here in the basement, at a around 72°. Although you probably want to store beers at a cooler temp when cellaring, this is the best I can do until Ma throws out all her jars of dill pickles and lets me start using the root cellar. Like that’ll every happen.

Without further ado, into the fire we go …

The ’05 and ’06 versions pour a deep, dark, slightly viscous brown, with virtually no head. The ’07 Autumnal pours quite a bit lighter—a slightly cloudy dark amber, with a small, short-lived head. This year’s (the 2008, just to clarify) is noticeably lighter, bright and clear, a gorgeous iridescent dark ruby color, with a perfect finger’s worth of head.

Smell-wise, the first two years are super malty—on deep sniffs visions of boiling grain come to mind. Raisin-like notes waft out of the glasses in dark intoxicating waves. The ’07 has a huge malt/grainy nose as well, but nothing compared to its predecessors, and with only hints of the dark fruit. The ’08 version’s aroma is more dry and biscuit-like than grainy, and there are some very light hop notes at the far edges of the whiffs.

Once a brewer starts putting things like cost and marketability above the quality of the beer, then the brewer is moving away from being a craft brewer.
Like last year’s tasting, the ’05 is all thick maltiness; syrupy sweet overtones to a giant-ass, velvety smooth body, transforming into a boozy, warming finish. The ’06, however, wasn’t so lucky. Jug, after only half a sip, was the first to point out that it was way oxidized, almost to the point of being undrinkable. This isn’t the least bit surprising, since sometimes it can take only a matter of months before some brews get skunked this way. The ’06 bottle was moderately oxidized in last year’s tasting, so it could be that that batch was more susceptible, or maybe I got a sixer with a poor seal on the caps. Whatever it is, for tasting purposes the ’06 is pretty much useless for our experiments.

The Fire from 2007 is lighter in body and sharper in the palate. The malt is quite pronounced, and there are more than hints of raisins and plums, although nowhere near what the ’05 exhibited. This year’s is even lighter, almost to the point that you’d describe the body as “medium,” with the biscuity malt aspects dominating, at least in the middle of the sip. Some sweet, dark notes lurk in the edges, but a hop and carbonation combo at the end provides a (comparitively, of course—Autumnal Fire is still a big beer) short, crisp finish.

And the verdict is … the recipe was, indeed, tweaked between the 2006 and 2007 batches. Hell, not just tweaked, but cranked. [Editor’s Note: Read the follow up to this assertion.] While the differences between the ’05 and the ’06 were fairly small—save for the oxidation—between those and the last two years is HUGE. I don’t think I’d say they were almost different beers—it is possible to pick out similarities—but there is absolutely not doubt that the malt bill has lightened considerably in the last two batches.

Autumnal Fire used to be a huge, challenging beer, but immensely rewarding to those who dared to finish a glass or two.
And so what? If Capital wants to tweak the recipe from year to year, that’s their prerogative. Frankly, it was great fun tasting the different vintages and sharing our thoughts on each. But what does concern me is the why for the tweak. Does the Capital brewmaster Kirby Nelson—and/or someone else calling the shots in Middleton—just like his Fire a little lighter and easier on the palate? If so, I don’t have a beef with that. There is, as the saying goes, no accounting for taste. But if it was for some other reason, such as, let’s say, because the accountants wanted to cut back on the barley bill or the marketing people thought they could get better penetration if the beer was more “accessible” to a larger pool of consumers, then I have a problem. A big fucking problem. Because once a brewer starts putting things like cost and marketability above the quality of the beer, then the brewer is moving away from being a craft brewer. And there’s only one way to go when moving away from being a craft beer brewer: a shit beer brewer.

Capital has a long way to go before becoming a shit beer producer, but it is my opinion that the quality of Autumnal Fire has suffered in the last couple of years. It used to be a huge, challenging beer, but immensely rewarding to those who dared to finish a glass or two. Now, although still an amazingly good doppel, it has lost a lot of its bite, audacity, and, thusly, its rich reward. It is now just another very good beer in a market that increasingly has more very good beers.

After a mere four sips (and several gravity measurements—Jug has an awesome set of brewing tools) Jug was so disgusted with our revelation that he slammed his glass down and said, “That’s it. I’m not buying another Autumnal Fire again.” I’m not sure I’ll go that far. But the magic of that original sip of Fire has without doubt worn off. And we can only lament its passing.

Until Capital decides to tweak the recipe again …





Comments
After tasting my first sip of this year's batch, I said nearly the exact thing that Jug did. Instead of buying my normal case, I stopped at that one six-pack. I'm disgusted that this once legendary brew has been stripped down to this.
posted by Eric | January 13, 2009, 2:00 PM
I agree that Autimnal Fire has been nerfed. Capital Brewery seems to have an identity crisis. They used to dominate the area of big, german lager's but have lost their way somehow. They retired great beers like Dark Dopplebock, Klosterweizen, and the Weizenbock, and added much lighter stepping stone beers like Rustic Ale and Island Wheat. To their credit they did retire a couple of not-so-good beers like Fest and had some good limited releases like the Baltic Porter and Eisphyre. It does seem they are upon the pecipice. We know they can make great beer when they want to, it's just that I wonder if making great beer is what they want to do. I haven't given up on them yet, but their light is dimming. Perhaps this new 'Imperial Dopplebock' they are releasing will give us/them more insight.
posted by Ryan | January 13, 2009, 5:43 PM
Ryan, when you taste the Imperial Dopplebock, it should help lift your opinion of Capital a bit. I've been fortunate enough to have tried it several times on tap, and it's quite nice. Like you said, they can make the good stuff if they want to.
posted by Eric | January 14, 2009, 9:21 AM
I wonder...is the Imperial Doppelbock a reincarnation of the aforementioned, long-lamented Dark Doppelbock? It's been so long since I had the Dark Doppelbock that it's impossible for me to say so with any certainty.
posted by EddieGlick | January 14, 2009, 1:27 PM
Rustic Ale is one of the biggest disappointments in beer history. Kirby has talent, and can make great beer, but rustic sucked, bad. I am all for breweries to make light/easy drinking beers to get people into the craft beer market, look at spotted cow and fat tire. It is those beers that keep craft brewing alive and allow them to make other great beers. But Rustic ale was just a bad beer.
posted by Kyle | January 26, 2009, 5:23 PM

Drinkin’ And Thinkin’

Beer Dorks News

Want to know how healthy the craft beer industry is? As always, look to Portland. Craft pioneer Bridgeport announces sudden closure, adding to a growing list of PDX casualties.
Did Anheuser-Busch Chicago offer their shit beer to Cody Parkey before his missed field goal? Because that may explain why he "accidentally" biffed it.
Chicago now has the most breweries of any city in the country. Other things Chicago has the most of: murders, mobsters, and Ditkas.
Trying to spin it positive, BA releases end of year graphic. Only 5% growth in the craft sector when nearly 1000 new breweries opened? That's a collapse waiting to happen.
R.I.P. Tallgrass... another casualty as the regional/national craft beer market continues to get squeezed.
Wait... Constellation Brands cut all of the Ballast Point and Funky Buddha sales staff? They merged it with their Corona/Modelo staff?? We're SHOCKED!!!
Pizza Beer founder crying about failure of company, blames everyone else. Reminder, the beer tasted like vomit. Try having better ideas or making better products so you're not a failure.
It's Bud Light so doesn't really matter, but we expect this beer to be sitting around for awhile.
Indiana brewery to open with controversial beer names to "get the conversation going". Translation: taking advantage of serious issues for free publicity.
Hundreds of amazing beers in Wisconsin and the Cubs took back the one everyone drinks just because it exists and people have heard of it. How fitting...